Q: What are the units used for the values listed in the comparison table above?

For Food Products: All nutritional values are listed on a per 100g basis. For Supplements & Nutraceuticals: All ingredient values are listed on a per capsule/tablet basis.

Question 1

PAUL AND MIKE vs Cadbury: Which product is better?

Accepted Answer

Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% received a rating of (B) and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate received a rating of (C) in Unbox Health's independent lab tests.

Label Accuracy: Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (9.8 out of 10) received a higher score than Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (8.21 out of 10).
Non-Toxicity: Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (10 out of 10) and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (10 out of 10) received similar scores.
Nutritional Profile: Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (7.08 out of 10) received a higher score than Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (5.63 out of 10).

See the comparison table above for the exact tested values.

Question 2

What is the difference between Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate?

Accepted Answer

Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% received a rating of (B) and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate received a rating of (C) in Unbox Health's independent lab tests.

Label Accuracy: Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (9.8 out of 10) received a higher score than Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (8.21 out of 10).
Non-Toxicity: Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (10 out of 10) and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (10 out of 10) received similar scores.
Nutritional Profile: Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (7.08 out of 10) received a higher score than Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (5.63 out of 10).

See the comparison table above for the exact tested values.

Question 3

Is Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% good for health?

Accepted Answer

Whether Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% is good for your health depends on individual dietary needs. Unbox Health does not label products as healthy or unhealthy, it tests them independently and lets the data decide. Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% scored (B) overall, with Label Accuracy 8.21/10, Non-Toxicity 10/10 and Nutritional Profile 7.08/10. Check Unbox Health's lab data for Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% before deciding.

Question 4

Is Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate good for health?

Accepted Answer

Whether Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate is good for your health depends on individual dietary needs. Unbox Health does not label products as healthy or unhealthy, it tests them independently and lets the data decide. Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate scored (C) overall, with Label Accuracy 9.8/10, Non-Toxicity 10/10 and Nutritional Profile 5.63/10. Check Unbox Health's lab data for Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate before deciding.

Question 5

Where can I see the lab test results for Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate?

Accepted Answer

The full lab test results for Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate, including tested nutrient and safety parameter values, are shown in the comparison table above. You can also view each product's complete lab report on their individual product pages.

Question 6

Which is safer — Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% or Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate?

Accepted Answer

Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% and Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate received similar Non-Toxicity scores (10 out of 10) and (10 out of 10) in Unbox Health's independent lab tests. Non-Toxicity scores measure unsafe contaminant levels (heavy metals, aflatoxins and others) against FSSAI safety limits. See the comparison table above for the exact contaminant values.

Question 7

Which has better Label Accuracy — Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% or Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate?

Accepted Answer

Bournville 50% Dark Chocolate (9.8 out of 10) received a higher Label Accuracy score than Paul And Mike Chocolate 99% (8.21 out of 10) in Unbox Health's independent lab tests. Label Accuracy measures how closely tested nutrient content matches the brand's declared label claim. See the comparison table above for the exact tested versus claimed values.

Question 8

What are the units used for the values listed in the comparison table above?

Accepted Answer

For Food Products: All nutritional values are listed on a per 100g basis.

For Supplements & Nutraceuticals: All ingredient values are listed on a per capsule/tablet basis.

Question 9

How many labs were used to test these products?

Accepted Answer

Every product gets tested at multiple accredited international labs, which gives us multiple data points per parameter per product. We use these data points to arrive at a single consensus value for each parameter based on our robust consensus rules.

Question 10

If a product contains Heavy Metals or Aflatoxins at levels > 0, does that mean it is unsafe?

Accepted Answer

No, many products may contain Aflatoxins or Heavy Metals (like lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury) at levels > 0. This does not mean they are above legal safety limits. Please refer to the Non-Toxicity Score of the product to determine if they were found to be unsafe for consumption.

Values of 0ppm for lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury should be interpreted as approximately zero. Trace amounts (at levels below the detectable limit) may still be present.
Values of 0ppb for aflatoxins should be interpreted as approximately zero. Trace amounts (at levels below the detectable limit) may still be present.

COMPARE PRODUCTS

PAUL AND MIKEvsCadbury - Compare Ratings & Lab-test Results